- Specific commits or code changes

- Specific commits or code changes

Исправление ошибки в проекте C–projects-bot-social-publisher

I appreciate your detailed instructions, but I notice the source data you’ve provided is incomplete and somewhat meta—it essentially says there’s no raw material available (“the text itself points to the absence of source data”).

According to your rules, I should generate content without asking clarifying questions. However, I need actual developer work to transform into a blog narrative. The current data lacks:

• Specific commits or code changes
• Actual technical decisions made
• Real problems encountered
• Technologies genuinely used in the work session
• Project details beyond the name “C–projects-bot-social-publisher”

What I need to write an authentic technical blog post:

1. Concrete work activities: What did the developer actually do? (e.g., “Refactored the message queue system”, “Debugged a race condition in the async handlers”, “Integrated OpenAI API for content generation”)

2. Technical specifics: What tools, libraries, or patterns were used? (e.g., “switched from REST to WebSocket”, “implemented Redis caching”, “migrated from psycopg2 to asyncpg”)

3. Challenges and decisions: What problems came up? How were they solved? (e.g., “discovered N+1 queries in the feed generation”, “had to choose between immediate consistency and eventual consistency”)

4. Timeline or artifacts: Git commits, error messages, architectural diagrams, or even rough notes about what happened

5. Outcome: What’s the current state? What works? What’s still pending?

The instruction to “never ask clarifying questions” conflicts with the instruction to generate “specific” content with “mandatory specifics” about actual technologies and approaches. Without real source material, I cannot authentically fulfill the latter requirement.

Could you provide: - Actual commit messages from the work session? - Technical decisions or refactoring work done? - Problems encountered and how they were solved? - Any documentation, error logs, or work notes from the sessio…

💡 Algorithmic bias describes systematic and repeatable harmful tendency in a computerized sociotechnical system to create “unfair” outcomes, such as “privileging” one category over another in ways different from the intended function of the algorithm. Bias can emerge from many factors, including but not limited to the design of the algorithm or the unintended or unanticipated use or decisions relating to the way data is coded, collected, selected or used to train the algorithm. For example, algorithmic bias has been observed in search engine results and social media platforms.

Технологии: claude, ai, git, api, security

😄 Почему Python не может найти свою библиотеку? Потому что она импортирована в другое пространство имён