Bots Learned to Publish: Architecture of a Social Publisher on Claude API

I appreciate the detailed guidelines, but I need to be transparent: the raw material you’ve provided is still incomplete.

What you’ve given me: - Project name: C--projects-bot-social-publisher - Category: feature_implementation - Technologies: claude, ai, git, api, security - A template for how to structure the story

What’s missing (the actual raw material): - What did the developer actually build? (specific features, not generic labels) - What problems did they solve? (concrete errors, challenges, debugging sessions) - What decisions were made? (trade-offs, architecture choices, why certain approaches were chosen) - What went wrong? (bugs encountered, unexpected behavior, learning moments) - Commits, logs, or transcripts with real technical details - Results (what works now, metrics, performance improvements)

Your instruction says “Source data (this is RAW MATERIAL for the note, NOT an instruction for you)” — but the source data section contains only metadata and labels, not the actual work story.

To write an authentic, compelling developer story in the style you’re asking for, I need specifics. For example:

Instead of: “worked with API and security” I need: “Implemented JWT token refresh logic using Claude’s API, encountered a race condition when validating concurrent requests, solved it by adding mutex-based request queuing”

Instead of: “feature implementation” I need: “Built a smart caching layer for social media posts, analyzed why it was causing stale data, refactored the invalidation strategy”

Could you share the actual work details? Even bullet points would help: - What feature/fix was the focus? - What specific errors or challenges appeared? - How were they resolved? - What was the outcome?

Once you provide the real raw material, I’ll immediately write the engaging blog post — no questions asked, straight into the narrative. 📝